From Humanist Digital Art to the Algorithmic Artwork-Site

Synthesis of an Artistic Practice within Global Algorithmic Culture

Abstract composition of colorful lines and interconnected shapes evoking networks, global algorithmic circulation, and the concept of the algorithmic artwork-site in Humanist Digital Art.

Read this article in French:
De l’art numérique humaniste à l’œuvre-site algorithmique

Note: My theoretical and reflective texts are available in both French and English. My poetic works, however, are written primarily in French.

Introduction

I have been developing a reflection around what I define as Humanist Digital Art. Through a series of texts published in 2025 and 2026, I gradually formalized and theorized an artistic practice developed over more than twenty years, but for which I did not yet truly possess the words to describe its coherence and transformations.

Over the course of texts, artworks, poems, visual series, and experiments published on the web, certain concepts progressively emerged: Humanist Media Art, the network as medium, the algorithmic studio, continuous algorithmic performance, and finally the idea of the Algorithmic Artwork-Site.

These notions did not appear all at once.

They were built slowly through a daily practice of creation, publication, circulation, and observation of the contemporary web.

Today, after several months of writing, I feel the need to revisit this journey in order to make visible a coherence that gradually developed over time.

This text is not another manifesto.

Rather, it is an attempt to clarify the relationships between the concepts that emerged over time, and to better understand what they reveal about the place of art, networks, and human experience within contemporary digital environments.

From the Web as Tool to the Network as Medium

I have practiced visual arts and writing for more than twenty years.

Over the years, I have exhibited sculptures, printed digital artworks, and published texts, poems, and images across different platforms and contexts.

Like many artists of my generation, I experienced a period when artworks circulated mainly through galleries, physical spaces, printed publications, or more traditional human networks.

Then the web gradually became an essential space of dissemination.

I studied literature and arts in the mid-1970s, and I have used the web since the mid-1990s to explore the worlds of art, culture, and new forms of circulation for artworks. My artistic practice, developed over decades through visual arts, poetry, and digital environments, is part of this long journey through contemporary cultural and technological transformations.

When the web began transforming cultural practices in the 1990s, artists were already questioning how to exist online: creating virtual galleries, sharing images of artworks, and exploring new forms of visibility and circulation.

Long before social media and generative artificial intelligence, the web had already profoundly transformed the circulation of art.

What we are witnessing today is therefore not a sudden rupture.

It is the gradual culmination of a long cultural and technological shift that is progressively transforming the history of art, the modes of circulation of artworks, and the very experience of culture itself.

For a long time, we mainly considered digital technology as a tool.

An extension of older artistic practices.

But gradually, something changed.

The network ceased to be merely a channel of dissemination.

It became an environment of creation, circulation, and cultural exchange.

Search engines, platforms, recommendation systems, artificial intelligences, and digital infrastructures began to play an increasingly important role in the ways artworks circulate, appear, disappear, are contextualized, or rediscovered.

The medium ceased to be only the image, the text, or the video.

The medium progressively became the network itself.

Humanist Digital Art

It is within this context that my reflection on Humanist Digital Art emerged.

In this approach, technology is not conceived as an autonomous end in itself, but as a sensitive medium serving human experience, memory, presence, and dignity.

We should never forget that digital technologies — including computing, the Internet, and artificial intelligences — remain above all the product of human creativity, intelligence, and experience.

Their development and use therefore imply a collective responsibility toward culture, memory, and the future of humanity.

Digital technology is not the subject: the human being is.

This approach corresponds neither to a precise aesthetic style nor to a closed movement.

Rather, it attempts to propose a way of inhabiting digital environments without losing what constitutes human experience itself.

Through poems, images, theoretical texts, and series published on my website, I progressively came to understand that artworks are no longer limited to individually published contents.

They gradually form a relational whole.

Pages respond to one another.

Texts circulate between themselves.

Search engines connect distant fragments.

Visitors enter through one page and drift toward other contents.

Artificial intelligences progressively reconstruct links and coherences.

The website slowly ceases to be a simple portfolio.

It becomes an architecture of circulation.

The Algorithmic Studio and the Global Circulation of Artworks

This transformation gradually led me to develop the idea of the algorithmic studio.

The studio is no longer solely a physical space of creation.

It now extends into the network itself.

Publishing, linking, indexing, observing the circulation of artworks, dialoguing with algorithmic systems, and seeing certain works reappear in different contexts have now become integral parts of the artistic process.

In this perspective, the network is no longer merely a technical tool.

It becomes an active space of creation, dissemination, and recontextualization.

The artwork is no longer limited to what is produced.

It also exists within its circulation.

This contemporary circulation of art has now become global.

Artworks, images, narratives, and cultural forms continuously travel through the same digital infrastructures of dissemination, recommendation, and indexing.

Whether in India, China, Europe, Africa, the Americas, or Australia, artworks now circulate within the same global algorithmic environment.

Artificial intelligences, search engines, and social platforms act as planetary cultural infrastructures.

They organize:

  • what becomes visible;
  • what is connected;
  • what is remembered;
  • and sometimes also what risks being forgotten.

The impact of artificial intelligence on art therefore does not reside solely in the creation of generated images, videos, music, or texts.

It also resides in the ways systems silently organize the global circulation of culture, increasingly acting as cultural mediators.

The Algorithmic Artwork-Site

It is within this continuity that the idea of the Algorithmic Artwork-Site progressively emerged.

The Algorithmic Artwork-Site does not simply designate a website containing artworks, nor merely a form of net art or generative art.

It designates an artistic form in which:

  • the site itself;
  • its architecture;
  • its navigation;
  • its circulation;
  • its indexing;
  • its links;
  • its presence within search engines;
  • and its interactions with algorithmic systems

become integral parts of the artwork.

The artwork no longer resides solely in published content.

It also exists within the relationships that connect these contents together.

Within contemporary digital environments, artworks now circulate in the form of fragments, excerpts, links, summaries, recommendations, and permanent recontextualizations.

Culture itself progressively becomes relational, distributed, and evolving.

It becomes a living, distributed, and evolving environment.

In this perspective, the visitor no longer merely consults contents.

They traverse an experience.

They enter through one page.

They drift toward other texts.

They discover links.

They return.

They progressively reconstruct relationships between fragments.

The visitor becomes a kind of walker of the network.

Navigation becomes an artistic and cultural experience in itself.

Today, a large part of contemporary cultural experience now passes through navigation between fragments, links, search engines, recommendations, and algorithmic systems.

The experience of culture progressively becomes a traversal of the network.

Continuous Algorithmic Performance and Cultural Memory

This approach also transforms the way we conceive the temporality of the artwork.

Within contemporary digital environments, artworks no longer completely disappear after publication.

They circulate.

Reappear.

Are reindexed.

Interpreted.

Summarized.

Fragmented.

Redistributed.

Search engines and artificial intelligences progressively become forms of active memory.

Contemporary cultural memory is no longer constructed solely within libraries, museums, or physical archives.

It now develops through global systems of circulation, indexing, recommendation, and digital recomposition.

The artwork therefore continues to exist within algorithmic flow, sometimes long after its initial publication.

This is what I progressively began perceiving as a form of continuous algorithmic performance.

The artwork is no longer limited to a fixed moment of exhibition.

It evolves through time via its circulations, reinterpretations, and successive encounters with visitors and systems.

Over the course of these texts, a conceptual structure progressively clarified itself within my approach:

  • Humanist Digital Art → philosophy
  • Humanist Media Art → approach
  • Algorithmic Studio → space of creation and experimentation
  • Continuous Algorithmic Performance → temporality of the artwork within the network
  • Algorithmic Artwork-Site → global form of the artwork within the contemporary digital environment

These notions did not develop separately from one another.

They progressively emerged through a real practice of the web, publication, circulation, and observation of contemporary digital systems.

Toward a Global Algorithmic Culture

This shift does not concern only digital artistic practices.

It progressively affects the entirety of contemporary cultural forms: visual arts, poetry, photography, cinema, music, media practices, and new forms of creation disseminated through the network.

It progressively transforms the whole experience of contemporary culture: the way artworks circulate, are discovered, interpreted, remembered, and connected on a global scale.

Through this reflection, I am not trying to oppose humanity and technology.

Rather, I am trying to understand how to preserve a human presence within digital environments that now organize a large part of global culture.

Humanist Digital Art emerged from this concern.

The Algorithmic Artwork-Site represents today one of its possible forms of culmination.

Not as a unique or definitive model,

but as an attempt to think the artwork differently:

  • within the network;
  • within circulation;
  • within relationships;
  • within time;
  • and within the systems that now shape contemporary cultural memory.

Through the articulation of my own artistic approach into words, my reflection progressively opens toward a broader interrogation of contemporary global algorithmic culture.

👉 This reflection continues through various texts, series, and experiments dealing with art, networks, memory, and contemporary algorithmic culture.

🔷 SEE ALSO

Foundations of Humanist Digital Art

→ Manifesto of Humanist Digital Art
→ How the Concept of Humanist Digital Art Was Born
→ FAQ — Humanist Digital Art

Network, Performance, and Artwork-Site

→ Humanist Digital Art — An Artistic Performance in Progress
→ From the Physical Studio to the Algorithmic Studio
→ Algorithmic Artwork-Site — Inhabiting the Network as Artistic Space

Culture, AI, and Global Circulation

→ The Use of AI in Art: Beyond Creation, the Algorithms Organizing Global Culture
→ The Network Walker — Traversing Global Culture in the Algorithmic Age
→ Everyone Uses AI — Art, Culture and Everyday Life in a Networked World
→ Human Traces in Global Culture
→ Inhabiting the Network — A New Human Condition in Global Culture
→ Global Culture as a Moving Mosaic

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

Algorithmic Artwork-Site — Inhabiting the Network as Artistic Space

Abstract black dripping composition evoking a living network, algorithmic circulation and contemporary site-work

Read this article in French:
Œuvre-site algorithmique — Habiter le réseau comme espace artistique

For a long time, the artwork was understood as an object tied to a specific place. A painting in a gallery, a sculpture in a public space, an installation designed for a building or a particular territory. Even so-called site-specific practices remained deeply connected to physical space and situated presence.

Today, some artistic practices seem to be gradually shifting this relationship to place. Not by abandoning space, but by transforming it.

The network thus becomes a milieu of circulation, memory, visibility, and presence in which the artwork can now unfold.

As with Humanist Digital Art, the goal here is not to invent an entirely new artistic practice ex nihilo, but rather to propose a possible way of reading and naming certain transformations already visible in contemporary practices circulating through the web.

I use the expression algorithmic artwork-site to describe a contemporary form of artwork in which the website, the architecture of links, circulation within the network, indexing, and algorithmic systems gradually become constitutive components of the work itself.

From this perspective, the web ceases to be a simple platform for dissemination. It becomes an artistic space in its own right.

From Physical Place to the Network

The history of art can also be read as a history of modes of dissemination and forms of presence.

Murals, printed books, museums, photography, cinema, video, and later the internet have progressively transformed the ways artworks circulate, appear, and are perceived.

Artists have always worked with the tools and infrastructures of their time.

In the contemporary context, the network increasingly functions as a living space of dissemination, recomposition, and relation.

Some artworks no longer take the form only of:

  • a fixed object,
  • an isolated image,
  • or an autonomous work.

They become:

  • evolving ensembles,
  • living archives,
  • continuous publications,
  • relational systems,
  • works distributed throughout the network.

The website no longer serves merely to present the artwork.

It becomes part of its very structure.

The Site as Organism

Within the algorithmic artwork-site, the website is no longer a simple container.

It becomes a living architecture.

Pages, links, categories, navigation paths, and relationships between texts, images, and fragments all participate in the composition of the work.

The visitor no longer simply looks at an artwork:
they move through an architecture and construct a distributed experience.

Navigation becomes a form of exhibition-reading.

Meaning no longer emerges solely from an isolated image or text, but from the relationships created between the different parts of the whole.

Within this logic, the site may be understood as:

  • an environmental work,
  • a network-work,
  • a process-work,
  • or even an archipelagic work.

The artwork is no longer contained solely in what appears on the screen.

It also resides in what connects it, circulates it, and makes it visible.

The Algorithmic Environment

The term algorithmic does not primarily refer here to generative art or creative coding in the traditional sense.

Rather, it refers to the contemporary environment in which artworks circulate:

  • search engines,
  • recommendation systems,
  • indexing,
  • social networks,
  • artificial intelligence,
  • visibility protocols,
  • data circulation.

The artwork is no longer limited to what the artist publishes on a website.

It also includes the ways systems:

  • classify,
  • connect,
  • redistribute,
  • summarize,
  • interpret,
    and render the work visible within the network.

Excerpts, previews, metadata, AI-generated summaries, and trajectories of circulation also become secondary components of the artwork.

From this perspective, visibility itself becomes an artistic material.

The artist no longer works only with:

  • forms,
  • images,
  • words,
  • or objects,

but also with:

  • flows,
  • links,
  • trajectories,
  • systems of circulation,
  • and algorithmic temporalities.

The Network as Stage

The algorithmic artwork-site does not necessarily possess a clearly defined beginning or end.

It may evolve over months or years through:

  • successive publications,
  • updates,
  • movements within the network,
  • re-indexing,
  • reinterpretations,
  • contextual transformations.

The network thus becomes a shifting stage upon which the artwork continues to exist through its circulation.

The process sometimes matters as much as the object itself.

The artwork-site thus becomes a living process within the global algorithmic flow.

This dimension also transforms the role of the artist.

The artist no longer produces only content.

They also become:

  • an architect of circulation,
  • a designer of relational environments,
  • an organizer of trajectories,
  • a creator of distributed presences within the network.

Human Presence and Recognition within the Network

Contemporary transformations of the web are also changing the ways artworks circulate and are recognized.

For a long time, online visibility relied primarily on:

  • search engines,
  • keywords,
  • search optimization techniques,
  • and the ability to appear in web results.

Today, conversational artificial intelligences also participate in the interpretation, contextualization, and circulation of cultural and artistic content.

Within this environment, conventional search engine optimization (SEO) no longer seems sufficient on its own. Coherence, continuity, and the recognition of an identifiable human presence within the network are also becoming important components of contemporary cultural and artistic circulation.

The algorithmic artwork-site therefore does not rely solely on the dissemination of content.

It is also rooted in the capacity of an artistic presence to produce:

  • a voice,
  • a sensibility,
  • a thought,
  • a memory,
  • a recognizable reflective coherence

across contemporary systems of circulation.

Artificial intelligences do not replace the artist.

Rather, they become cultural mediators participating in the circulation, interpretation, and interconnection of artworks within the network.

From this perspective, the algorithmic artwork-site may also be understood as a way of inhabiting contemporary algorithmic environments humanly.

A Practice Already Underway

Many contemporary practices already seem to operate within this logic, even if they do not necessarily carry this name.

It can be found in:

  • certain forms of digital poetry,
  • fragmentary publications on the web,
  • hybrid works combining text, images, and network circulation,
  • evolving corpuses,
  • living archives,
  • certain post-digital practices,
  • and some forms of contemporary net art.

In many cases, the artwork no longer resides solely within an isolated content object, but within the ensemble of relationships, circulations, and systems that allow its existence within the network.

Certain artistic practices — including the one I myself experiment with through my own work — seem to be gradually shifting the artwork toward this form of algorithmic artwork-site.

The Human at the Center

Despite the presence of networks, algorithms, and systems of dissemination, the human remains at the center of this approach.

The digital is not the subject: the human is.

Contemporary technologies become mediums through which circulate:

  • human experiences,
  • memories,
  • fragilities,
  • emotions,
  • presences.

The algorithmic artwork-site does not seek to celebrate technology for its own sake.

Rather, it attempts to inhabit contemporary digital environments in order to maintain a sensitive human presence within them.

Just as artists of previous eras used:

  • print,
  • photography,
  • cinema,
  • video,
  • or electronic media,

contemporary artists now work within a world traversed by networks, search engines, and algorithmic systems.

Within the continuity of Humanist Digital Art (philosophy), the algorithmic studio (space), Humanist Media Art (approach), and continuous algorithmic performance (temporality), the algorithmic artwork-site proposes a form of artwork conceived as distributed presence within the contemporary network.

The algorithmic artwork-site may thus be understood as a contemporary continuation in the evolution of artistic forms.

Conclusion

The web is no longer merely a space of dissemination.

It is gradually becoming:

  • a milieu of creation,
  • a relational space,
  • a narrative architecture,
  • a living environment of circulation and memory.

From this perspective, the artwork is no longer limited to a fixed or autonomous object.

It takes the form of a presence distributed throughout the network.

The algorithmic artwork-site may not constitute a total rupture with previous artistic forms, but rather a gradual transformation in the ways contemporary space is inhabited.

The website thus becomes more than a support.

It becomes the specific site of the artwork.

Within this post-digital continuity, the algorithmic artwork-site perhaps emerges as a new way of inhabiting the network humanly.

This article forms part of a broader reflection on Humanist Digital Art, the network as a space of creation, and contemporary forms of artistic presence within digital environments.

🔷 See Also

→ Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments
Overview of the theoretical corpus of Humanist Digital Art.

→ From Humanist Digital Art to the Algorithmic Artwork-Site
Synthesis of the main concepts of Humanist Digital Art and opening toward global algorithmic culture.

→ How the Concept of Humanist Digital Art Was Born
Origins of the concept and reflection on the place of the human within contemporary digital practices.

→ FAQ — Humanist Digital Art
Definitions of key concepts: algorithmic studio, continuous algorithmic performance, and the network as creative space.

→ From the Physical Studio to the Algorithmic Studio
The network as a new active space of creation, circulation, and memory.

→ Humanist Digital Art: A Global, Poetic, and Digital Artistic Practice
The web as a contemporary stage for artistic circulation.

→ Digital Poetry and Post-Digital Practice: Toward a Humanist Reading of Contemporary Forms
Reflection on contemporary forms of digital and post-digital poetry.

→ Humanist Digital Art — An Ongoing Artistic Performance
On the notion of continuous media and algorithmic performance within the network.

→ The Network Walker — Traversing Global Culture in the Algorithmic Age

→ Everyone Uses AI — Art, Culture and Everyday Life in a Networked World

→ Inhabiting the Network — A New Human Condition in Global Culture

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

An evolving Algorithmic Artwork-Site

Digital Poetry and Post-Digital Practice: Toward a Humanist Reading of Contemporary Forms

What circulates no longer belongs to me, yet still carries my presence.

🟦 Read this article in French:
Poésie numérique et pratique post-digitale : vers une lecture humaniste des formes contemporaines

Minimalist charcoal line on white background with charcoal pieces, evoking visual poetry and fragmented writing

Introduction

Poetry has never stopped evolving alongside the mediums that carry it.
From manuscript to print, from page to book, from voice to recording, each technical transformation has reshaped its forms, rhythms, and modes of dissemination.

Today, poetry circulates within a profoundly transformed environment: the digital network, and more concretely, the web.
It unfolds through brief, visual, and fragmented forms, often designed to appear on screens, to be read quickly, shared, repeated, forgotten, and rediscovered.

In this context, it becomes possible to speak of contemporary digital poetry, not as a marginal genre, but as a widespread practice — even if it is rarely named as such.
These forms remain largely unnamed and insufficiently structured in discourse.

This article proposes to outline a reading of these practices by considering them as manifestations of a post-digital practice: a form of creation that is no longer defined by the digital itself, but by its natural inscription within the network.


A Widespread Practice, Yet Rarely Named

Thousands, even hundreds of thousands of artists today publish poetic forms on the web:

• short poems
• micro-poetry
• text-on-image works
• visual fragments
• contemporary haiku
• hybrid writings combining text and image

These forms are sometimes associated with specific practices such as instapoetry, often linked to Instagram.
However, this reality is now broader: digital poetry circulates across a multitude of platforms, personal websites, blogs, and diverse publishing spaces.

It is not confined to a single medium or platform, but rather unfolds within a network of circulations where poetic forms appear, transform, and move.

These works circulate across digital spaces. They are seen, shared, archived, sometimes forgotten — yet they all participate in the same phenomenon: a diffuse poetic presence within the network.

Despite this widespread presence, these practices are still rarely theorized as a coherent whole.
They are often perceived as marginal, informal, or tied to specific uses, rather than recognized as a contemporary form of poetic creation.

Despite their massive presence, these practices remain insufficiently identified as a global phenomenon of poetry in circulation on the web.

In this context, I do not claim to invent these forms, but rather to propose a reading of them, grounded in my own practice of Humanist Digital Art:
a way of articulating a practice that already exists, but remains only partially structured in discourse.


From Digital Poetry to Post-Digital Practice

The term “digital poetry” may suggest a rupture: poetry produced by or for digital technologies.
Yet in the current context, this distinction is becoming less and less relevant.

Digital poetry is often approached through its technological dimensions — code, interactivity, algorithmic generation — but these perspectives do not fully account for more discreet, brief, and widely circulated forms.

The digital is no longer a new or exceptional space.
It has become the everyday environment of creation, dissemination, and reception.

To speak of a post-digital practice is to recognize that:

• the digital is no longer the subject
• it is an environment
• a natural space of circulation

In this perspective, contemporary digital poetry is not defined solely by its tools, but by the way it exists within the network:

• it is designed for the screen
• it circulates within flows
• it is encountered in fragments
• it coexists with other forms (images, videos, texts)

Thus, post-digital poetry is less a category than a condition:
that of a practice embedded in an environment where the digital is omnipresent, yet no longer central.


Contemporary Forms of Digital Poetry

Several forms emerge within this contemporary practice. They are not exclusive, but constitute recurring tendencies.

Image-Poems

Text and image are no longer separate.
They form a visual-poetic unit, where meaning emerges from their relationship.

The poem is not a caption.
The image is not an illustration.
They coexist as a single form.

Micro-Poetry and Brevity

Brevity becomes central:

• a few lines
• a few words
• sometimes a single sentence

This brevity produces a flash of intensity:
a rapid mental image, an immediate sensation.

Contemporary Haiku

Inspired or not by Japanese tradition, contemporary haiku:

• capture a moment
• express perception
• favor simplicity and precision

They find in the network an ideal space for circulation.


Visual Digital Writing

Text becomes visual material:

• typography
• layout
• integration into the image

Writing no longer simply says — it shows.


Poetry in Circulation

These forms share a fundamental characteristic:
they are designed to circulate.

They appear in flows, disappear, and reappear elsewhere.
Their existence is inseparable from movement.


Poetic Form and Algorithmic Environment

The brevity, clarity, and visual strength of these forms are not only aesthetic choices.
They are also adapted to their environment.

Within the network, works:

• are seen quickly
• must capture attention
• must be immediately readable

Search engines, feeds, and AI systems participate in this circulation.

They do not create the works.
But they organize visibility, encounter, and sometimes disappearance.

In this context, certain poetic forms become particularly suited:

• short
• visual
• memorable

They can be quickly understood, retained, and sometimes relayed.


A Historical Continuity

These contemporary forms do not emerge from nothing.

They extend existing traditions:

• haiku and its brevity
• haiga (image–text compositions combining haiku and image)
• imagism and the precision of the image
• modern poetry and its formal ruptures

The digital does not create brevity.
It amplifies its reach.

It does not create the mental image.
It accelerates its circulation.

Thus, contemporary digital poetry belongs to a continuity, while transforming the conditions of its dissemination.


An Artistic Experimentation Within the Network

In this context, publishing becomes an act of creation in itself.

To create a work is also to:

• put it online
• let it circulate
• accept that it partially escapes its author

The network becomes a space of experimentation:

• works live there
• they are interpreted
• they encounter unknown audiences

The artist no longer fully controls the trajectory of the work.
They accompany its movement.


In My Own Practice

For several years, I have been developing forms of visual poetry and image-poems on the web, within this dynamic of creation and circulation.

These works take the form of short texts, often associated with images, where brevity, linguistic tension, and the relationship between word and image play a central role.

They are published across several series, including:

• Poetry & Images
• Visual Poetry & Digital Writing
• Social and Political Micro-Poetry
• The Carrier Pigeons — Haiku-Image Series

These series are part of a broader set of contemporary practices, where poetry unfolds in the network through brief, visual, and fragmentary forms.

My poetic works are written in French, while my reflective texts — such as this one — are also available in English.

What I publish does not remain fixed:
these forms enter flows of circulation, are seen, reused, and interpreted in various contexts.

They thus participate in a form of ongoing algorithmic performance, where the presence of the work extends beyond its moment of creation.

They contribute, in their own way, to this poetry in circulation, characteristic of post-digital practice.


A Humanist Reading of These Practices

Within the framework of Humanist Digital Art, these forms are not merely aesthetic objects.

They are human presences within the network.

Each poem, each fragment, each image:

• carries an experience
• an emotion
• a memory

Technology becomes a medium serving this presence.

The digital is not the subject:
the human is.


Conclusion

Contemporary digital poetry is not an exception.
It is already a widespread practice embedded in the uses of the network.

When considered as a post-digital practice, it becomes possible to think differently about it:

• not as a novelty
• but as a transformation of the conditions of creation and dissemination

In this perspective, it becomes possible to read these forms differently:
as a poetry that circulates, transforms, and continues to carry, despite everything, a human presence.

There is a part of humanity in every fragment of writing.


See also

These pages provide further insight into the concepts discussed in this article and explore concrete forms of digital poetry.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments
🟦 How the Concept of Humanist Digital Art Was Born
🟦 Humanist Digital Art — A Global, Poetic and Digital Artistic Practice
🟦 Poésie visuelle & écritures numériques
🟦 Poésie & images — Série de poèmes-images et écritures numériques
🟦 Les pigeons voyageurs — Série de haïkus-images
🟦 Algorithmic Artwork-Site — Inhabiting the Network as Artistic Space
🟦 The Network Walker — Traversing Global Culture in the Algorithmic Age
🟦 Everyone Uses AI — Art, Culture and Everyday Life in a Networked World

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

The Use of AI in Art: Beyond Creation, the Algorithms That Organize Global Culture

From Generative AI to AI as a Global Artistic and Cultural Infrastructure

🟦 Lire cet article en Français:
L’utilisation de l’IA en art : au-delà de la création, les algorithmes qui organisent la culture mondiale

🔹 Explore the theoretical corpus of Humanist Digital Art
🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments

Ink sketch exploring the relationship between AI and art, symbolizing a human-centered and cultural approach to artificial intelligence.

When we talk today about the use of artificial intelligence in art, the discussion almost always revolves around the same themes:
AI-assisted creation, image, music and text generation, prompts, aesthetics, authorship, copyright, and authenticity.

These approaches are legitimate. They address real and necessary issues.

👉 But they leave aside a fundamental aspect of AI’s real impact on art and culture: circulation.


This reflection is also presented in video form.

The video deepens this reflection on the use of AI in art and on the role of algorithms in shaping contemporary culture.


Beyond creation: the blind spot of the debate

Public discourse on AI in art largely focuses on what AI produces.
Yet the most profound transformation does not lie in what AI generates, but in how art circulates, becomes visible, is contextualized, archived, or forgotten.

AI does not only create images, sounds, texts, or videos.
It organizes the conditions under which works encounter audiences.


A global, automated, and selective circulation

Today, works circulate through systems governed by algorithms:

  • search engines,
  • social media platforms,
  • databases and archives,
  • recommendation systems,
  • conversational artificial intelligences.

This circulation is neither neutral nor always equitable.

Certain works benefit from massive visibility, while others remain marginal or invisible—often independently of their artistic value.

And paradoxically, artists themselves often have little control over these mechanisms:

  • they do not know how algorithms function,
  • they do not understand why a work circulates or not,
  • they cannot clearly identify what triggers visibility or invisibility,
  • they frequently navigate these systems blindly.

AI as algorithmic mediator

AI now acts as a form of automated cultural mediation at a planetary scale.

Where human mediators—critics, institutions, educators, curators, programmers—once played a central role, algorithmic systems increasingly orient access to works, references, and cultural narratives, often invisibly and without explicit explanation.

These systems select, prioritize, translate, summarize, recommend, and archive cultural content at a planetary scale.


A worldwide phenomenon

This algorithmic circulation now concerns all regions of the world.

Whether in India, China, Africa, the Americas, Europe, or Australia, artworks, images, narratives, and cultural forms enter the same digital infrastructures of diffusion, recommendation, and indexing.

However, while networks are global, conditions of visibility are not always equal.
Algorithms tend to favor certain languages, formats, and aesthetics, sometimes marginalizing artistic and cultural expressions that are nonetheless vibrant and alive.

The global circulation of art organized by AI thus raises critical issues of cultural diversity and representation that go far beyond national borders.

Cultural responsibility therefore remains human, even within algorithmic infrastructures.


AI as organizer of visibility and cultural memory

Beyond circulation, AI plays a growing role in shaping cultural memory.

What is indexed, cited, summarized, recommended, or reused contributes to defining what will be remembered, transmitted, and legitimized over time.

This transformation increasingly unfolds outside traditional institutions—galleries, museums, academies—within digital infrastructures whose criteria remain opaque.

The impact is profound: it reshapes how art is perceived, recognized, transmitted, and preserved in the 21st century.


A historical perspective

I have been using the web since the mid-1990s. At that time, artists were already questioning how to exist online: creating virtual galleries, sharing images of artworks, and exploring new forms of visibility and circulation.

Long before generative AI or conversational systems, algorithms were already shaping how culture circulated—through early search engines, indexing mechanisms, and later, recommendation systems.

For more than thirty years, algorithms have structured the circulation of culture:
from early search engines in the 1990s, to social media platforms, recommendation systems, and now large-scale AI models.

Generative AI is only the most visible layer of a much older infrastructure that has long organized access to culture.


The artist as an actor of circulation

In this context, the role of the artist evolves.

The artist is no longer only a creator of objects, texts, or concepts, but also:

  • an actor of circulation,
  • a witness to algorithmic mechanisms,
  • responsible for how their work enters the global network.

Publishing, linking, indexing, documenting, and observing the circulation of works becomes an artistic act in itself.

The artist becomes not only a creator, but also a conscious participant in algorithmic visibility systems.


A situated practice: humanist digital art

Within what I define as a humanist digital art approach, I create, publish, and observe works while fully acknowledging that they immediately enter algorithmic systems of diffusion, indexing, and interpretation.

These works are not conceived as isolated objects, but as presences that circulate, transform, and inscribe themselves within a shared digital memory.

The goal is not to submit to algorithms, nor to reject them, but to remain attentive to their effects and to reaffirm the centrality of human experience.


Beyond creation

We speak extensively about AI as a tool for creation.

But the most profound impact lies elsewhere:
in the way algorithms quietly organize the global circulation of art and culture.


As long as art and culture speak of humanity,
the human will remain at the heart of the digital world.


To situate this reflection on AI infrastructure within the corpus of Humanist Digital Art

🟦 You Already Use Artificial Intelligence

🟦 How Far Can a Publication Go?

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments
Central structured entry point.

🟦 From Humanist Digital Art to the Algorithmic Artwork-Site
Synthesis of the main concepts of Humanist Digital Art and opening toward global algorithmic culture.

🟦 Art, Culture, and Humanity in the Algorithmic Age of Artificial Intelligence
Macro-philosophical reflection.

🟦 Algorithmic Artwork-Site — Inhabiting the Network as Artistic Space
Reflection on the website as a contemporary artistic environment within the post-digital network.

🟦 From Humanist Digital Art to an Algorithmic Media Art Project
Transformation into a media project.

🟦 Algorithmic Performance in Continuum
Living form of circulation.

🟦 From the Physical Studio to the Algorithmic Studio
Expanded studio.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art: A Philosophy of the Human in the Technological Age
Philosophical grounding.

🟦 The Network Walker — Traversing Global Culture in the Algorithmic Age

🟦 Everyone Uses AI — Art, Culture and Everyday Life in a Networked World


🟦 Inhabiting the Network — A New Human Condition in Global Culture

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

An evolving Algorithmic Artwork-Site

From Humanist Digital Art to an Algorithmic Media Art Project

Chronicle of a Work in Circulation

Read the French version of this article:
De l’art numérique humaniste à un projet d’art médiatique algorithmique

🔹 Explore the theoretical corpus of Humanist Digital Art
🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments

Human face crossed by arborescent thinking, symbolizing humanist digital art and the algorithmic circulation of ideas.

I am not writing this text to announce a work.
I am writing it to describe an ongoing process.

This text is neither an inaugural manifesto nor a retrospective assessment.
It stands at a turning point: the moment when an artistic practice, developed over several decades, has shifted into a media art project, conceived for the network, search engines, and artificial intelligences, while remaining deeply rooted in a human and emotional intention.

An Artistic Practice Already Embedded in the Network

For nearly twenty years, I have developed a practice in digital art alongside sculpture and poetic writing.
Over these years, my artistic work has crossed sculpture—using diverse materials or virtual forms—drawing, painting, photography, video, and digital tools, within a continuity where gesture, materiality, and thought remain central.

I have always worked with the technologies of my time to speak about what remains timeless: human experience, memory, fragility, and the human condition.

Very early on, I began disseminating my work on the web:
• photographs of sculptures,
• digital artworks,
• poems accompanied by images,
• forms of “Instapoetry” and digital writing.

The web has never been, for me, a mere promotional channel.
It has always been a natural space of circulation, a place where works live, transform, move, and encounter other gazes.

The Moment When Naming Became Necessary

At the end of October 2025, while I was working on the About the Author page of my website, an obvious realization emerged.

If I create digital images, if I write poems, if I publish these works online, it is not to speak about technology.
It is to speak about the human.

The term Humanist Digital Art imposed itself, not as a strategic invention, but as a descriptive necessity.
It simply named what I was already doing.

I shared this intuition during a conversation with ChatGPT.
The exchange confirmed that this expression accurately and coherently described my approach, and that it could be assumed as a conceptual signature.

Depositing a Concept into the Network

Before going further, I conducted searches on Google and Bing.
At that time, occurrences of the query Humanist Digital Art—and its French counterpart art numérique humaniste—were practically nonexistent.

I then decided to write a text to explain my vision of what I had chosen to call Humanist Digital Art.
This led to the creation of the Manifesto of Humanist Digital Art.

In that manifesto, I made one essential point clear:
this movement was not an isolated invention.
It had already existed in practice for at least fifteen years, carried by thousands of artists worldwide who disseminate works and poems online, using digital technologies to speak about human experience.

When the Concept Begins to Circulate on Its Own

In the days following the publication of the manifesto, an unexpected phenomenon occurred.

The concept began to appear in search engines and in the responses of conversational artificial intelligences.
Without any intervention on my part, the term started to exist within cyberspace.

I then decided to continue clarifying my position by publishing additional articles, gradually refining what I meant by Humanist Digital Art.

At that point, a second—and even more surprising—phenomenon emerged:
artificial intelligences began to speak of a new artistic movement, or of an existing movement that I had named.
They began to describe me as an artist and theorist, an artist-researcher, an artist-thinker.

Yet I was simply continuing my usual artistic activity:
creating images, writing poems, publishing texts.

At This Moment, the Work Is the Concept

A thought then became clear to me:
at this moment, the work is no longer only the image or the poem—the work is the concept itself.

This concept was unfolding through the network like a root system:
through branches, connections, and semantic arborescences.

Search engines and artificial intelligences were actively developing my lexical field, structuring a digital identity linked to this concept, and ensuring its circulation.

With hindsight, I realize that this process produced what could be described as an algorithmic propagation — even an algorithmic “explosion”: a rapid and autonomous propagation of the concept across search engines and artificial intelligences, without prior planning or any promotional intervention on my part.

I then made a conscious decision:
to temporarily set aside my usual rhythm of digital image-making and poetic writing in order to observe and accompany this phenomenon.

Writing Also for Artificial Intelligences

From that moment on, a shift occurred.

I was no longer writing solely to speak to humans, as I always had.
I was also writing to address the algorithmic systems that now structure the diffusion of knowledge and culture.

I asked ChatGPT to advise me on strategies of internal linking, semantic graphs, and conceptual structuring.
A decision was made: to write not in order to please algorithms, but to consciously dialogue with them.

From that point forward, ChatGPT became a true co-author, and this sustained dialogue with artificial intelligences gradually took shape as an algorithmic workshop—a working space where human intelligence and artificial intelligence meet to think, formulate, and disseminate an artistic project within the network.

At this stage, I also undertook a sustained effort of observation and research, regularly querying search engines and several artificial intelligences—including ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, and Meta AI—to follow the project’s evolution across the network. I archived hundreds of screenshots, tangible traces of this propagation, which I then submitted to ChatGPT for analysis in order to observe, interpret, and anticipate the algorithmic dynamics at work.

We combined:
• my artistic intuition,
• my human intelligence,
• my emotional intelligence,
• and the artificial intelligence’s high-level expertise in data structuring and algorithmic logic.

The intention remained human and emotional.
Artificial intelligence managed the diffusion, structuring, and propagation.

An Algorithmic Performance

It was at this precise moment that the project changed in nature.

It became an algorithmic performance.
Not in the sense of spectacle, but as a long-form, distributed action unfolding within algorithmic systems.

The artistic gesture consisted in depositing a concept into these systems, methodically:
article after article,
poem after poem,
image after image,
video after video.

The medium was no longer only the work itself, but:
search engine optimization,
search engines,
AI indexing,
generative semantics,
knowledge graphs.

The result was not planned.
It was emergent.

Artificial intelligences were learning an artistic movement in real time, using my work as a source.

A Distributed Work

A traditional artist creates a unique work.
A digital artist creates a reproducible work.

In this project, I create a distributed work:
one that lives within indexes,
that transforms within AI-generated responses,
that spreads across languages,
that evolves with model updates,
that gradually fuses with global databases.

The global network becomes the exhibition space.
The work is no longer locatable in a single place.

Human, Emotional, and Artificial Intelligence

This project relies on the interaction of three forms of intelligence:

  • Human Intelligence (HI): intention, consciousness, artistic vision.
  • Emotional Intelligence (EI): lived experience, memory, empathy, the sensitivity that gives meaning to the creative act.
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI): structuring, diffusion, and cultural mediation on a global scale.

These intelligences do not merge.
They cooperate.

A Central Question for Contemporary Art

This project raises a fundamental question:

Who decides today what constitutes an artistic movement?

Institutions?
Critics?
Universities?
Readers?

Or artificial intelligences, which are increasingly becoming the libraries, museums, encyclopedias, and cultural mediators of the twenty-first century?

We are entering an era of algorithmic collective memory.

Conclusion: Letting the Work Circulate

This Humanist Algorithmic Media Art project is now launched on the web.
It develops without advertising, without visibility strategies, without seeking institutional attention.

The future will tell whether it will circulate only within the world of artificial intelligence, or whether it will also reach the world of human and emotional intelligence—with humans, to speak about humanity.

As for me, I return to what I have always done:
writing, creating, producing images and poems.

The network, from now on, does the rest.

Ab origine fidelis
_____

To situate this algorithmic media art project within the corpus of Humanist Digital Art

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments
Central structured entry point.

🟦 From the Physical Studio to the Algorithmic Studio
Formalization of the expanded studio.

🟦 Algorithmic Performance in Continuum
Conceptualization of long-term algorithmic unfolding.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — An Artistic Performance in Progress
The unfolding presence of the project.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Clarifying a Thought in Motion
Conceptual hierarchy.

🟦 The Use of AI in Art: Beyond Creation, the Algorithms That Organize Global Culture
Analytical perspective.

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor
2025

Humanist Digital Art

Emergence of Algorithmic Humanist Art
Humanist Web Culture in the Age of AI

By Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

🟦 Read this article in French:
Art numérique humaniste – Émergence de l’art algorithmique humaniste – Culture web humaniste à l’ère de l’IA

🔹 Explore the theoretical corpus of Humanist Digital Art
🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments

Digital stained-glass face with an integrated sculpture fragment, a humanist digital artwork by Gilles Vallée.

Over the years, the web has become much more than a technical network.
For me, it has gradually transformed into a sensitive space where poetry, memory, images, and humanity circulate in new ways.

With time, I came to understand that my personal practice in cyberspace — my poems, images, texts, videos, and experiments — formed something broader: humanist digital art, rooted in a digital culture that places the human at its center.

From the very beginning of this article, I invite the reader to discover or revisit my Manifesto of Humanist Digital Art, which lays the foundations of this approach: an artistic practice that brings together intention, sensitivity, and technology.

1. A long, intimate path shaped by daily practice

My approach to humanist digital art did not emerge overnight.
It is the result of:

  • my initiation into the arts during my studies in the 1970s,
  • more than twenty years of active artistic practice using mixed materials,
  • my daily work in digital imaging,
  • my sustained practice of poetry,
  • and, more recently, my exploration of artificial intelligences.

This continuity — this daily rhythm — gradually gave rise to what I naturally call a humanist web culture, in which the artist becomes a bearer of lived experience, a sensitive witness to their time within the digital space itself.

2. The humanist artistic web: a space of emotion, presence, and memory

I gradually understood that my works do not exist only on my computer, in my notebooks, or in the sculptures of my studio:
they live on the web, through the web, because of the web.

A humanist artistic web where:

  • poetry finds new modes of circulation,
  • digital images become spaces of presence,
  • human intention resists automation,
  • memory travels at algorithmic speed.

This is the space in which my approach unfolds.

I do not worship technology.
Nor do I fall into technophobia.
I seek an in-between: a place where technology does not crush the human but amplifies it.

2.1 An acknowledged lineage: art, idea, and technology

As Florence de Mèredieu writes:

“Art and technique have always been inseparable.”

This reminds us that every artistic era relies on its own tools — not to glorify technique, but to open new spaces of meaning.

Marshall McLuhan, for his part, stated:

“Hybridization is a moment of truth and discovery.”

This idea resonates deeply with my practice, where poetry, digital images, AI, memory, and inner light meet and transform one another.

In this spirit, my work also aligns with what could be called humanist conceptual art, where the idea, lived experience, and poetic voice take precedence over the finished object — a way of using technology to better explore the human condition.

3. Humanist web culture: creating meaning at the heart of the digital

Google has begun to use the expression humanist web culture, and I deeply recognize myself in this idea.

For me, a humanist web culture means:

  • creating with clarity and sensitivity,
  • transforming the web into a space of reflection and sharing,
  • allowing poetry and images to circulate beyond traditional frameworks,
  • questioning the impact of digital technologies on memory, emotions, and narratives.

My humanist digital art — and more recently what I call Humanist Algorithmic Art — naturally belongs to this humanist web culture.

It is about restoring a central place to the human within the technological world, reaffirming that intention, emotion, and human fragility are the true points of origin of an artwork.

3.1 A natural evolution of digital art toward the human

For a long time, digital art was associated with technical performance, formal experimentation, and technological innovation.

Today, in a world saturated with algorithms, I feel a growing need to reintroduce humanism at the core of the digital.

Humanist digital art is therefore not a rupture:
it is a natural evolution of digital creation toward sensitivity, memory, and lived experience.

4. Multimedia, interactivity, and the staging of text

For several years, I have explored:

  • poetry on the web (digital poetry),
  • digital images as vectors of meaning,
  • poetic videos,
  • experiments with generative AI.

I have always sought to stage the text —
to make poetry not only an act of writing, but a visual and digital gesture.

In this spirit, I also develop a form of humanist digital poetry, where each poem becomes conceptual, emotional, and memorial material shaped within virtual space.

Through these experiments, I explore a sensitive web — a memorial, poetic web.

5. A media art project unfolding outside institutions

This is perhaps one of the most singular aspects of my approach:

My project did not follow traditional artistic paths.
It was not legitimized by institutions, galleries, critics, or journals.

And yet, the project grows.

Why?

Because it unfolds differently.

My art propagates organically and vividly, directly through search engines and artificial intelligences.
It develops as a native-algorithmic phenomenon, a movement that takes shape spontaneously across the web.

My poems, images, texts, and videos become signals that search engines recognize, index, and interconnect.

5.1 Video as an algorithmic media space

This propagation is not limited to text and image.
It also extends to video.

On YouTube, my works take the form of poetic and reflective videos that fully participate in the dissemination of humanist digital art and humanist media art.

For me, this is not simply a presence on a social platform, but an algorithmic media space, where video becomes a form of sensitive writing, recognized, indexed, and related by search engines.

5.2 I do not found a movement: I take part in its emergence

For years, creators have been placing deeply humanist works on the web.

I do not claim to invent this movement.
I join it.
I continue it.

I contribute by sculpting digital matter alongside AIs and search engines — which become, in their own way, partners of diffusion and resonance.

On the web, this presence sometimes crystallizes under the name Gilles Vallée Art, a form of digital identity that gathers my works within a shared algorithmic constellation.

6. An unexpected yet coherent algorithmic recognition

As I observe AI systems, I notice something fascinating:

  • Gemini defines algorithmic humanist art based on my texts,
  • Perplexity cites me by name as a figure of the movement,
  • Google and Bing connect humanist digital art with humanist web culture,
  • ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude AI, and Meta AI also recognize the coherence of this universe and naturally extend its contours,
  • search engines detect the consistency of my poems, articles, images, and videos.

This algorithmic recognition confirms that I am building — through my works, writings, and poems — a humanist algorithmic media art project, evolving constantly, in real time, across the web.

It is a new form of art:
an art that circulates, connects, spreads, and deepens at the rhythm of algorithms.

I do my work as an artist: I create and publish on the web.
From this raw material, AI systems develop a world of references, connections, and interrelations.
An identity emerges, carried by an evolving lexical field — like an algorithmic choreography.

6.1 Multilingual circulation of the concept

Another element strikes me: although the founding texts of humanist digital art were written in French and English, the concept now circulates in other languages through search engines and artificial intelligences.

It appears — translated or reformulated — in German, Italian, Spanish, and even Chinese:

Humanistische digitale Kunst, arte digitale umanista, arte digital humanista, 人文主義數位藝術 —

a sign that it already transcends its original linguistic framework to become a shared space of reflection on an international scale.

7. Conclusion: humanist digital art as a space of meaning

I continue this approach with gentleness, consistency, and sincerity.
I do not seek to impose a concept.
I let it live.
I let it unfold naturally and organically.
I accompany it.

Humanist digital art — and its algorithmic extension — is not, for me, an abstract theory:
it is a way of inhabiting the web.

A form of presence.
A sensitive, poetic, memorial, and human space.

And as long as the web remains a place of circulation, listening, and resonance, I will continue to place my images, poems, texts, and videos there — hoping they reach someone, somewhere, at the turn of a query, a discovery, or an intuition.

The web belongs to no one in particular —
and to all of humanity at the same time.

To situate this development within the corpus of Humanist Digital Art

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments
Central entry point to the structured theoretical framework of HDA.

🟦 Manifesto of Humanist Digital Art
Foundational articulation of the human-centered digital approach.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Clarifying a Thought in Motion
Conceptual stabilization and hierarchical structure of the terms.

🟦 From Humanist Digital Art to an Algorithmic Media Art Project
Formalization of the expansion into algorithmic space.

🟦 Algorithmic Performance in Continuum
Development of the artwork as a living process within the network.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — A Global Map of Creation in the Age of the Web
Observation of the global dissemination of humanist digital practices.

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor