Human Traces in Global Culture

Memory, Transmission, and Presence in a Networked World

Graffiti displaying the word TRACES painted on a weathered and cracked urban wall, evoking memory, transmission, and the traces left by human beings across time.

Read this article in French:
Les traces humaines dans la culture mondiale

The Network Walker and the Network Witness

I have been observing the evolution of the web since the mid-1990s. I witnessed the first search engines, the beginnings of personal websites, discussion forums, social media platforms, recommendation algorithms and, more recently, conversational artificial intelligence systems.

Over the years, I have become both a Network Walker, moving through the cultural spaces of the web, and a Network Witness, observing the transformations of memory, transmission, and human presence within these constantly evolving environments.

Despite all the technological changes, one thing has always struck me: human beings continue to leave traces.

I have seen artists publish artworks, writers create books, musicians record albums, researchers share knowledge, and ordinary people tell their stories through photographs, texts, and videos. The tools change, but the desire to transmit something of oneself seems to remain.

Today, these traces take new forms, yet they belong to a much older history than digital technology itself.

For tens of thousands of years, human beings have sought to transmit something of themselves across time.

The First Human Traces

Tens of thousands of years ago, human beings left their handprints on rock walls. Others painted animals, carved symbols into stone, or told stories around a fire.

Those traces still reach us today.

The earliest human traces take the form of imprints, cave paintings, petroglyphs, symbolic objects, and oral traditions. Long before writing, they already reveal a desire to communicate, transmit knowledge, share experiences, or simply mark one’s passage through the world.

Art is among the earliest manifestations of this desire for transmission. Cave paintings, prehistoric sculptures, and symbols engraved in stone all represent attempts to preserve a human presence beyond the moment in which it was lived.

Those first creators could never have imagined that their works would still be observed thousands of years later. Yet their traces continue to bear witness to their existence.

Traces, Memory, and Transmission

Human beings do not transmit information alone. They also transmit emotions, values, stories, worldviews, and lived experiences.

Traces become memory.

Memory enables transmission.

Transmission allows a human presence to travel through time.

A family photograph, a poem, a story told by a grandparent, or a song learned in childhood can sometimes cross several generations. Their value lies not only in the information they contain, but also in the human experience they carry.

The history of human culture can be read as a long succession of forms of memory. Some are material, others immaterial. Some take the form of objects, others of stories or cultural practices. All contribute to the construction of a collective memory that extends beyond individual lives.

Art and the Great Forms of Human Memory

Throughout my life, I have met many artists and spent time in artist-run centres. I have seen creators devote years, sometimes decades, to their work without knowing what might endure.

Some creations disappeared.

Others continue to be seen, read, heard, or shared.

Looking back, I believe this reality extends far beyond the world of art. It reveals something deeply human: the desire to transmit an experience, share a vision of the world, and leave a trace of one’s passage through life.

Art, literature, music, architecture, archives, and great cultural works represent different ways of transmitting part of the human experience to future generations.

Across centuries, societies have built libraries, preserved archives, told stories, composed songs, and created works that continue to testify to their existence long after their creators have disappeared.

These forms of transmission constitute an important part of what we call culture today.

A Global Networked Culture

Today, this dynamic is taking on a new dimension.

Through digital networks, a significant portion of human memory now circulates on a planetary scale. Works of art, texts, photographs, films, knowledge, and testimonies become accessible almost instantly from countless locations around the world.

Today I can consult works preserved in museums located on the other side of the planet, read texts written in distant countries, or discover artists whom I would never otherwise have encountered.

Global culture does not replace local cultures. Instead, it creates a new space of circulation where memories, stories, and experiences from different regions can encounter one another.

This worldwide circulation opens extraordinary possibilities, but it also raises important questions. How can we preserve the diversity of cultures, languages, and traditions within a widely shared digital space? How can we avoid situations where certain memories become dominant while others remain invisible?

Global networked culture is not a finished state.

It is a process in constant transformation.

Digital Traces

Websites, digital platforms, online libraries, collaborative encyclopedias, and digital archives constitute new forms of human traces.

The media change, but the impulse remains remarkably similar to that which animated the first creators of cave paintings.

To say:

“I was here.”

To share an experience.

To transmit knowledge.

To leave a trace.

For more than twenty years, I have published digital artworks, poems, photographs, and reflections on art, culture, and human experience on the web.

Over time, I came to understand that these publications also constitute traces.

Some may be forgotten.

Others may continue to circulate.

I have seen platforms disappear, technologies become obsolete, and content become difficult to find. I have also seen certain works and texts continue to travel through the network long after they were first published.

Like books, photographs, and artworks before them, these digital traces participate in their own way in the long history of human transmission.

Toward a Global Collective Memory?

This evolution raises a fascinating question.

Is humanity in the process of building a form of global collective memory?

Projects such as digital libraries, web archives, collaborative encyclopedias, and artificial intelligence systems provide access to an unprecedented quantity of knowledge in human history.

For the first time, a significant portion of the world’s knowledge, works, stories, and memories is becoming accessible on a planetary scale.

An increasing part of humanity’s cultural memory is becoming searchable, interconnected, and shareable.

This evolution is also accompanied by a form of cultural transnationalism. Works, stories, ideas, and human experiences now cross borders with unprecedented ease. A photograph published in one country can be viewed seconds later on another continent. A poem, an artwork, or a testimony can circulate across the globe. Without erasing local identities, this growing interconnectedness gradually contributes to the formation of a global cultural space where memories and human experiences meet beyond national boundaries.

This global collective memory does not replace local, family, or national memories. Instead, it connects them within a larger framework where knowledge, works, and experiences from very different contexts can coexist and interact.

Perhaps we are witnessing the emergence of a new form of global collective memory.

Human Presence in the Network

Yet memory is not merely a question of storage.

Human memory cannot be reduced to the accumulation of information.

Algorithms can organize, classify, and distribute content. They can also influence what becomes visible, what circulates more widely, and sometimes what risks being forgotten.

Meaning, however, remains a human creation.

Memories, emotions, stories, and lived experiences continue to belong to the human experience.

Transmission is not simply the transfer of information.

It is also a relationship.

A presence.

A dialogue between people separated by time, distance, or even generations.

When someone today discovers an old photograph, a poem published decades ago, or the testimony of a stranger living on the other side of the world, something more than information is transmitted. One human experience enters into relationship with another.

Some people now imagine that their writings, archives, images, voices, or conversations might one day contribute to the creation of conversational avatars capable of transmitting part of their memory.

Whether such projects become reality may matter less than what they reveal: the profoundly human desire to continue transmitting a presence beyond one’s own existence.

Memory and Forgetting

Every memory remains fragile.

Languages disappear.

Works are lost.

Archives deteriorate.

Websites close.

Platforms cease to exist.

Forgetting always accompanies memory.

The cave paintings that have survived probably represent only a tiny fraction of those that were once created. Many libraries have disappeared throughout history. Even today, millions of web pages become inaccessible over time.

We often speak about the ability of digital technology to preserve traces. Yet the digital environment has its own fragility: obsolete formats, closed platforms, broken links, deleted content, or information simply lost within the immensity of the network.

Perhaps it is precisely this fragility that gives human traces their value.

Transmitting a Presence

From the first handprints left on rock walls to the digital traces circulating today through global networks, human beings have never ceased transmitting part of themselves through time.

Technologies change.

Media change.

Forms of transmission evolve.

Yet the human desire to leave a trace, share an experience, and transmit a presence remains.

Perhaps this is one of the deepest characteristics of our condition: the desire to extend a small part of our presence beyond the moment in which we live.

And within this long history of human traces, each of us participates, in our own way, in the memory of the world to come.

See Also

🟦 You Publish… But Are You Really Seen?

🟦 The Network Walker — Traversing Global Culture in the Algorithmic Age
A reflection on the human experience of global culture within contemporary digital networks.

🟦 Everyone Uses AI — Art, Culture, and Everyday Life in a Networked World
How algorithmic systems already participate in the daily circulation of knowledge, stories, and culture.

🟦 From Humanist Digital Art to the Algorithmic Artwork-Site
A synthesis of the principal concepts developed within the Humanist Digital Art corpus.

🟦 Algorithmic Artwork-Site — Inhabiting the Network as Artistic Space
A reflection on the website as a space of creation, memory, and cultural circulation.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art: A Global, Poetic, and Digital Artistic Practice
How artworks, texts, and poems can circulate globally through the network.

🟦 Inhabiting the Network — A New Human Condition in Global Culture

🟦 Global Culture as a Moving Mosaic

→ Understanding Today’s Culture
A cultural chronicle of micro-essays exploring human experience in a global networked culture.

Mot « TRACES » peint en noir dans un style graffiti sur fond blanc. / The word “TRACES” painted in black graffiti style on a white background.

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

The Use of AI in Art: Beyond Creation, the Algorithms That Organize Global Culture

From Generative AI to AI as a Global Artistic and Cultural Infrastructure

🟦 Lire cet article en Français:
L’utilisation de l’IA en art : au-delà de la création, les algorithmes qui organisent la culture mondiale

🔹 Explore the theoretical corpus of Humanist Digital Art
🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments

Ink sketch exploring the relationship between AI and art, symbolizing a human-centered and cultural approach to artificial intelligence.

When we talk today about the use of artificial intelligence in art, the discussion almost always revolves around the same themes:
AI-assisted creation, image, music and text generation, prompts, aesthetics, authorship, copyright, and authenticity.

These approaches are legitimate. They address real and necessary issues.

👉 But they leave aside a fundamental aspect of AI’s real impact on art and culture: circulation.


This reflection is also presented in video form.

The video deepens this reflection on the use of AI in art and on the role of algorithms in shaping contemporary culture.


Beyond creation: the blind spot of the debate

Public discourse on AI in art largely focuses on what AI produces.
Yet the most profound transformation does not lie in what AI generates, but in how art circulates, becomes visible, is contextualized, archived, or forgotten.

AI does not only create images, sounds, texts, or videos.
It organizes the conditions under which works encounter audiences.


A global, automated, and selective circulation

Today, works circulate through systems governed by algorithms:

  • search engines,
  • social media platforms,
  • databases and archives,
  • recommendation systems,
  • conversational artificial intelligences.

This circulation is neither neutral nor always equitable.

Certain works benefit from massive visibility, while others remain marginal or invisible—often independently of their artistic value.

And paradoxically, artists themselves often have little control over these mechanisms:

  • they do not know how algorithms function,
  • they do not understand why a work circulates or not,
  • they cannot clearly identify what triggers visibility or invisibility,
  • they frequently navigate these systems blindly.

AI as algorithmic mediator

AI now acts as a form of automated cultural mediation at a planetary scale.

Where human mediators—critics, institutions, educators, curators, programmers—once played a central role, algorithmic systems increasingly orient access to works, references, and cultural narratives, often invisibly and without explicit explanation.

These systems select, prioritize, translate, summarize, recommend, and archive cultural content at a planetary scale.


A worldwide phenomenon

This algorithmic circulation now concerns all regions of the world.

Whether in India, China, Africa, the Americas, Europe, or Australia, artworks, images, narratives, and cultural forms enter the same digital infrastructures of diffusion, recommendation, and indexing.

However, while networks are global, conditions of visibility are not always equal.
Algorithms tend to favor certain languages, formats, and aesthetics, sometimes marginalizing artistic and cultural expressions that are nonetheless vibrant and alive.

The global circulation of art organized by AI thus raises critical issues of cultural diversity and representation that go far beyond national borders.

Cultural responsibility therefore remains human, even within algorithmic infrastructures.


AI as organizer of visibility and cultural memory

Beyond circulation, AI plays a growing role in shaping cultural memory.

What is indexed, cited, summarized, recommended, or reused contributes to defining what will be remembered, transmitted, and legitimized over time.

This transformation increasingly unfolds outside traditional institutions—galleries, museums, academies—within digital infrastructures whose criteria remain opaque.

The impact is profound: it reshapes how art is perceived, recognized, transmitted, and preserved in the 21st century.


A historical perspective

I have been using the web since the mid-1990s. At that time, artists were already questioning how to exist online: creating virtual galleries, sharing images of artworks, and exploring new forms of visibility and circulation.

Long before generative AI or conversational systems, algorithms were already shaping how culture circulated—through early search engines, indexing mechanisms, and later, recommendation systems.

For more than thirty years, algorithms have structured the circulation of culture:
from early search engines in the 1990s, to social media platforms, recommendation systems, and now large-scale AI models.

Generative AI is only the most visible layer of a much older infrastructure that has long organized access to culture.


The artist as an actor of circulation

In this context, the role of the artist evolves.

The artist is no longer only a creator of objects, texts, or concepts, but also:

  • an actor of circulation,
  • a witness to algorithmic mechanisms,
  • responsible for how their work enters the global network.

Publishing, linking, indexing, documenting, and observing the circulation of works becomes an artistic act in itself.

The artist becomes not only a creator, but also a conscious participant in algorithmic visibility systems.


A situated practice: humanist digital art

Within what I define as a humanist digital art approach, I create, publish, and observe works while fully acknowledging that they immediately enter algorithmic systems of diffusion, indexing, and interpretation.

These works are not conceived as isolated objects, but as presences that circulate, transform, and inscribe themselves within a shared digital memory.

The goal is not to submit to algorithms, nor to reject them, but to remain attentive to their effects and to reaffirm the centrality of human experience.


Beyond creation

We speak extensively about AI as a tool for creation.

But the most profound impact lies elsewhere:
in the way algorithms quietly organize the global circulation of art and culture.


As long as art and culture speak of humanity,
the human will remain at the heart of the digital world.


To situate this reflection on AI infrastructure within the corpus of Humanist Digital Art

🟦 You Already Use Artificial Intelligence

🟦 How Far Can a Publication Go?

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments
Central structured entry point.

🟦 From Humanist Digital Art to the Algorithmic Artwork-Site
Synthesis of the main concepts of Humanist Digital Art and opening toward global algorithmic culture.

🟦 Art, Culture, and Humanity in the Algorithmic Age of Artificial Intelligence
Macro-philosophical reflection.

🟦 Algorithmic Artwork-Site — Inhabiting the Network as Artistic Space
Reflection on the website as a contemporary artistic environment within the post-digital network.

🟦 From Humanist Digital Art to an Algorithmic Media Art Project
Transformation into a media project.

🟦 Algorithmic Performance in Continuum
Living form of circulation.

🟦 From the Physical Studio to the Algorithmic Studio
Expanded studio.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art: A Philosophy of the Human in the Technological Age
Philosophical grounding.

🟦 The Network Walker — Traversing Global Culture in the Algorithmic Age

🟦 Everyone Uses AI — Art, Culture and Everyday Life in a Networked World


🟦 Inhabiting the Network — A New Human Condition in Global Culture

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

An evolving Algorithmic Artwork-Site

Art, Culture, and Humanity in the Algorithmic Age of Artificial Intelligence

Prospective notes for thinking about the future of art and culture

Read this article in French:
Art, culture et humanité à l’ère algorithmique de l’intelligence artificielle

🔹 Explore the theoretical corpus of Humanist Digital Art
🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments

Digital artwork showing fragmented self-portraits with clocks replacing faces, symbolizing time, memory, and humanity in the algorithmic era.

Introduction — Thinking about the future without forgetting the human

We are living through a moment of transition. Digital technologies, the web, and now artificial intelligence are profoundly transforming how art is created, circulated, perceived, and transmitted. In the face of these changes, public discourse often oscillates between technological fascination and fears of dehumanization.

For my part, I do not believe that art is disappearing, nor that it will be replaced by machines. Rather, I believe we are being called to rethink our human responsibilities in a world where cultural diffusion is increasingly algorithmic.

Before offering any projections about the future, it seems essential to recall a simple but fundamental truth: art is never an abstraction. It acts upon real human lives.


Human experience as the foundation of any reflection on the future

About twenty years ago, I presented a bas-relief sculpture on the theme of suffering to two women. One of them became silent and deeply pensive. Tears began to flow. She told me that the work had brought back memories of sexual abuse she had endured as a child. It was the first time I fully realized that my work could trigger emotional reactions I had neither anticipated nor controlled.

A few years later, during a solo exhibition of my sculptures at an artist-run center, I saw a woman crying in front of a piece entitled The Silence of the Patient. The sculpture depicted a suffering figure, its mouth covered with fabric, like a gag. She asked if I was the sculptor. When I said yes, she burst into tears. She told me she was living with cancer, that she had little time left, and that the sculpture expressed exactly how she felt inside.

Another defining moment in my practice occurred during the creation of a work for the sculpture garden of the Douglas Institute in Montreal, on the theme of Alzheimer’s disease. I worked with a sculptor and welder whose parents had both died from the illness, as well as with a writer who composed a short text engraved on a plaque accompanying the sculpture. We announced that, at the inauguration, people could place inside the artwork a personal object connected to someone who had lived with or died from the disease.

To my great surprise, dozens of people came. They left letters, jewelry, photographs, and personal mementos. One person even placed a small quantity of her mother’s ashes, sealed inside a simple plastic tube. These human traces are now permanently enclosed within the artwork, for decades—perhaps longer.

These experiences demonstrate art’s enduring capacity to touch the human deeply — across mediums and across time.

But such reactions do not occur only in physical spaces. I also receive responses following the online publication of poems and digital images. One recent experience relates to my work in humanist digital art. I published poems about grief and death, some of which were integrated into short videos. One of these videos simply presents the following micro-poem:

Tears of mourning are heavy;
they carry the weight of absence.

(This micro-poem was originally published online in French. The English version presented here is a contextual translation.)

The video lasts twenty-one seconds and displays a digital image. YouTube often recommends it to people searching for content related to grief. One viewer left a comment: “Rest in peace, Mother.” In cyberspace, an algorithm guided a grieving person and offered them a place to express themselves.


A central affirmation

These very different experiences converge toward a deep conviction: regardless of the medium and the mode of distribution, art must continue to evoke emotion by speaking to human experience—even, and especially, in an algorithmic world.


Artificial intelligence as an extension of human intelligence

It is essential to remember that artificial intelligence was created by humans, based on models of human intelligence. It is not an enemy, but an extension of ourselves. It is up to us to determine how we choose to work with it.

Throughout history, major inventions have transformed the transmission of knowledge. The printing press profoundly altered access to ideas and learning. Later, radio, photography, cinema, television, personal computers, and mobile phones expanded this process. The creation of the internet triggered a global explosion in cultural circulation.

Today, we are witnessing the deployment of artificial intelligence. Knowledge, memory, and cultural diffusion are entering a new phase of transformation. Responsibility remains human.


Prelude to the projections

The projections that follow are neither science fiction nor abstract speculation. They are based on trends already visible in the diffusion of art, culture, and knowledge in the algorithmic age. They aim to extrapolate from the present in order to better understand the human responsibilities that are taking shape for the future.


Ten projections for thinking about the future of art and culture

These projections do not predict the future; they illuminate trajectories already visible.

  1. Artificial intelligences will become major cultural mediators, capable of contextualizing, explaining, and making artworks accessible to broader audiences.

  2. Search engines and AI systems will become the primary channels through which art and culture circulate, deeply transforming traditional visibility structures.

  3. Artistic recognition will increasingly take place within algorithmic spaces, where coherence, clarity, and human resonance will shape visibility.

  4. Artists will carry heightened responsibility for what they disseminate online, as their works contribute to shaping human experience within algorithmic environments.

  5. Art will become increasingly international and deterritorialized, circulating globally without physical displacement.

  6. Linguistic barriers will gradually erode through algorithmic mediation, enabling translinguistic circulation of works and ideas.

  7. Poetry will regain a social and political role, drawing its strength from its ability to humanize, bear witness, and speak to human experience within a digital world.

  8. Literary forms will evolve toward digital writings that are distributed, translated, and contextualized by artificial intelligences.

  9. Artists will need to invent ethical forms of collaboration with AI, conceived as working partners rather than substitutes for human creation.

  10. Despite transformations in media and modes of distribution, human creation will remain central, because lived experience, sensitivity, and human memory cannot be reduced to automation.

Conclusion

In this context, humanist digital art can be understood as a conscious and contemporary formulation of humanist art in the algorithmic age—one in which technology remains a medium in the service of human experience, memory, and dignity.

The artist’s studio is no longer limited to a physical or digital space. It now extends into the network itself, where works circulate, transform, and sometimes function as genuine algorithmic performances.

The digital is not the subject. The human is.


To situate this prospective reflection within the corpus of Humanist Digital Art

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Theoretical Corpus and Developments
Central structured entry point to the HDA framework.

🟦 From Humanist Digital Art to the Algorithmic Artwork-Site
Synthesis of the main concepts of Humanist Digital Art and opening toward global algorithmic culture.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art: A Philosophy of the Human in the Technological Age
Philosophical grounding of the human-centered approach.

🟦 Manifesto of Humanist Digital Art
Foundational articulation of the principles.

🟦 Humanist Digital Art — Clarifying a Thought in Motion
Conceptual hierarchy and formalization.

🟦 The Use of AI in Art: Beyond Creation, the Algorithms That Organize Global Culture
Analytical examination of algorithmic infrastructures.

🟦 From the Physical Studio to the Algorithmic Studio
Reflection on the transformation of the artistic space.

🟦 The Network Walker — Traversing Global Culture in the Algorithmic Age

🟦 Everyone Uses AI — Art, Culture and Everyday Life in a Networked World

🟦 Human Traces in Global Culture

🟦 Inhabiting the Network — A New Human Condition in Global Culture

🟦 Global Culture as a Moving Mosaic

🌍Thinking About Culture

I invite you to explore Understanding Today’s Culture, a series of micro-essays devoted to human experience, contemporary culture, and our networked world.

→ Explore the Understanding Today’s Culture series


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor
2025

Handwritten French sentence expressing a human trace in an algorithmic world, linking art, culture, AI, and human experience.
A human trace in an algorithmic world