The More Digital the World Becomes, the More Important the Human Becomes

Sculpture depicting a human figure integrated into a digital composition with blue, grey, and red textures.

Read this article in French:
Plus le monde devient numérique, plus l’humain devient important

An Everyday Scene

You go online.
You search the Web for an image of a man working on a sculpture.
Among the results, an old photograph appears showing a sculptor in his studio.
You see him working with the material.
This moment actually happened.

Then you ask an artificial intelligence to generate an image of a man working on a sculpture.
A few seconds later, another image appears.
It is convincing.
The gesture looks real.
So does the dust.

Yet something has changed.
In the first image, this moment was lived.
In the second, this moment was simulated.

In the first photograph, a human being was there. He touched the material and engaged in an act of creation. The photograph preserves a trace of that moment.

What we are looking at, then, is not simply an image of a man at work. Something of his experience reaches us.

Human beings have always passed their experiences on to one another in this way. Through stories, objects, works of art, letters, photographs, or films, we discover what others have seen, felt, imagined, or lived.

The digital world does not make these traces disappear. On the contrary, it can preserve them, circulate them, and allow us to encounter them.

But a new cultural and artistic environment is taking shape. Algorithmic systems can also produce images, texts, or music that seem to carry the trace of a human experience without a human being having lived what they represent.

In this environment, being anchored in human experience takes on particular importance.

Behind a photograph, a story, a work of art, or a testimony, we can encounter the experience of another human being. Through the trace they have left behind, something of that experience can travel through time, circulate in the digital world, and reach us.

Representations produced by algorithmic systems are not necessarily anchored in human experience in this way. They can move us, surprise us, or lead us to imagine an experience without necessarily being the trace of a real human experience.

The more digital the world becomes, the more important the human becomes.

📚All Micro-essays

This text is part of the Understanding Today’s Culture series, a chronicle of our global networked culture.

→ Return to the Micro-essays page

Explore Further

🟦 Why Do We Still Need Artists?

🟦 Why Continue Making Art in a Digital World?

🟦 Why Do Some Human Traces Endure Through Time?

🟦 Why Continue Writing Poetry in a Digital World?

🟦 Let’s Be Human with AI

🟦 Humanist Digital Art: A Philosophy of the Human in the Technological Age


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

Who Will Shape Cultural and Artistic Recognition Tomorrow?

Cultural Stewards

Two black-and-white checkerboard spheres dotted with colorful squares, evoking circulation and cultural diversity.

Read this article in French:
Qui fabriquera la reconnaissance culturelle et artistique demain ?

You log on.
You ask a search engine to name some internationally recognized artists.
An AI-generated overview suggests several names, grouped by artistic field.

But who decided that these artists were recognized?

For a long time, this recognition was largely shaped and transmitted by different mediators: museums, galleries, critics, curators, publishers, universities, media organizations, and other cultural institutions.

Painting, sculpture, literature, poetry, music, theatre, cinema: among all the works created in these fields, some have been recognized and passed on by these stewards. By preserving, publishing, exhibiting, interpreting, or studying them, they have also contributed to their longevity.

Today, other stewards have joined them: search engines, platforms, recommendation systems, and artificial intelligence. Without replacing institutions, they are participating in a new ecosystem of recognition.

Today, a work can have little presence within institutions and yet be encountered by millions of people in our global networked culture. It can be searched for, shared, cited, and continually recirculated.

Is that enough to call it recognition?

Not necessarily. A work can go viral on the Web and then disappear. Popularity, circulation, recognition, and longevity are not the same thing.

Time, however, can have an impact. If a work continues to be encountered, transmitted, and rediscovered over the years, its circulation can contribute to its recognition and longevity.

This phenomenon is not new. From Leonardo da Vinci to Van Gogh, from Baudelaire to Rimbaud, works continue to endure because generations of stewards have preserved, studied, published, exhibited, or transmitted them.

And behind this circulation, there are not only algorithms. There are also people. Their searches, publications, links, citations, and encounters leave traces that new mediators can, in turn, organize and bring to our attention. Search engines and AI systems can suggest a work. But without a human encounter, there will be no one to recognize it, transmit it, and contribute to its longevity.

Tomorrow, institutions, audiences, and new stewards will probably participate together in shaping cultural and artistic recognition.

Stewards may change.
Technologies may change.
But a culture remains alive only if people continue to share it.

📚 See All Micro-essays

This text is part of the Understanding Today’s Culture series, a chronicle of our global networked culture.

→ Return to the Micro-essays page

Explore Further

🟦 Why Do Some Human Traces Endure Through Time?

🟦 Why Do We Still Need Artists?

🟦 The Horizon of Circulation

🟦 The Use of AI in Art: Beyond Creation, the Algorithms Organizing Global Culture


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

Why Do Some Human Traces Endure Through Time?

Works, Ideas and Knowledge: The Stewards of Cultural Continuity

Two sunflowers in a vase, one yellow and inspired by Van Gogh, the other transformed into a black-and-white checkerboard pattern.

Read this article in French:
Pourquoi certaines traces humaines traversent-elles le temps ?

A scene from everyday life:

You log on.
You run a search.
You are shown a painting by Vincent van Gogh.

You encounter a work created more than a century ago, without going to a museum and without ever seeing the original.

But this story is not just about painting.

A poem, a novel, a song, a film, a photograph, an idea or a piece of knowledge can also travel across generations.

How do they reach us?

And why do some of these human traces continue to circulate while others disappear?

Van Gogh’s story offers us a clue.

Van Gogh left behind paintings, drawings and letters. Traces.

His brother Theo supported him and helped preserve these traces. After both brothers died, Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, Theo’s widow, played a crucial role in preserving, exhibiting and bringing Vincent’s work to public attention.

Then others took over.

Collectors, art dealers, museums, researchers, teachers and publishers. Later came photographers, filmmakers and television. Then the Internet, search engines, platforms and, today, artificial intelligence.

All became, in their own way, mediators.

Stewards.

Through them, the traces left by Van Gogh continued their journey, encountering new people generation after generation.

The journey can be summarized as follows:

Traces → Mediators → Horizon of Circulation → Effective Circulation → Longevity

A broader horizon of circulation, however, does not guarantee that a work will endure through time. It simply opens up more possible paths.

And preserving a work may not be enough to ensure its cultural longevity.

A work can lie dormant in an archive for decades. It still exists, but no one encounters it.

Preservation allows a trace to survive. Circulation and encounters allow it to remain alive in culture.

Perhaps this is what longevity means: not a state achieved once and for all, but a process. A work is rediscovered, viewed, studied, discussed, reproduced, transmitted and then put back into circulation.

Each generation receives traces from the past and passes some of them on to the next.

We, too, are stewards.

Perhaps cultural longevity is, above all, a succession of human encounters across time.

Diagram: Traces → Mediators → Horizon of Circulation → Effective Circulation → Longevity.

 📚View all Micro-Essays

This text is part of the series Understanding Today’s Culture, a chronicle of global networked culture.

→ Back to the Micro-Essays page

Further Reading

🟦The Horizon of Circulation

🟦The More Digital the World Becomes, the More Important the Human Becomes

🟦Why Do We Still Need Artists?

🟦Who Will Shape Cultural and Artistic Recognition Tomorrow?

🟦Let’s Be Human with AI

🟦The Use of AI in Art: Beyond Creation, the Algorithms That Organize Global Culture


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

How Far Can a Publication Go?

The Horizon of Circulation in Global Culture

Black-and-white checkered spheres gradually receding into a vast white space, illustrating the horizon of circulation of works, ideas and knowledge through cultural mediators.

Read this article in French:
Jusqu’où une publication peut-elle aller ?

An everyday scene:

You log on.
You search for a topic that interests you.
Within seconds, you find a fascinating article.
You read it.

Then you discover that it was written by someone living on the other side of the world and translated so that you could read it.

You realize that only a few decades ago, you probably would never have had access to that text.

What made this encounter possible?

For centuries, works, ideas and knowledge have circulated through mediators such as storytellers, scribes, booksellers, librarians, teachers and critics. Today, new algorithmic mediators — search engines, digital platforms and artificial intelligence — also play an essential role in their circulation.

In our example, it is precisely these new mediators that made this encounter possible.

Mediators make encounters possible. But their ability to circulate a publication also depends on the way it is published.

Choosing how to publish

Take the example of a poet who wishes to share a poem.

The poet may choose to recite the poem during a poetry reading before an audience of about ten people, without publishing it.

The poet may also decide to publish it in a printed poetry collection distributed through a few bookstores, reaching a few hundred readers.

Or the poet may publish it online, where it can be shared, indexed by search engines, recommended by digital platforms, sometimes cited by artificial intelligence, and discovered by tens of thousands of readers around the world.

The poem is exactly the same.

What changes is the potential extent of its journey.

This is what I call the horizon of circulation.

Several ways of making a text accessible coexist. If we choose to publish it, each publishing method opens a different horizon of circulation. The chosen method of publication therefore influences the potential extent of the circulation of a work, an idea or a piece of knowledge.

I have used the example of a poem, but the same phenomenon applies to every publication: a work of art, an idea, a piece of knowledge or even a simple personal testimony.

Algorithmic mediators now allow certain publications to reach a horizon of circulation on the scale of global culture.

Choosing how to publish also means choosing how far a publication may potentially travel.


📚 View all Micro-Essays

This text is part of the series Understanding Today’s Culture, a chronicle of global networked culture.

→ Back to the Micro-Essays page

Further Reading

🟦 You Already Use Artificial Intelligence

🟦 You Publish… But Are You Really Seen?

🟦 Who Will Shape Cultural and Artistic Recognition Tomorrow?

🟦 The Horizon of Circulation

🟦 AI in Art: Beyond Creation, the Algorithms That Organize Global Culture

🟦 Global Culture as a Moving Mosaic

🟦 Why Do Some Human Traces Endure Through Time?


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

You Already Use Artificial Intelligence

The Real Impact of AI on Art and Culture

Black-and-white cube symbolizing the circulation of culture through digital networks, featuring the silhouette of a human observer. Illustration for the micro-essay "You Already Use Artificial Intelligence."

Read this article in French:
Vous utilisez déjà l’intelligence artificielle

An everyday moment:

You log on.

You are looking for something to read. You ask a search engine a question. A streaming platform recommends a film. An artificial intelligence suggests new cultural discoveries.

A few seconds later, it feels as though you have simply found what you were looking for.

Yet something important has just happened…

You have encountered culture in a way that is very different from how your parents or grandparents did.

For centuries, we have discovered culture and knowledge through mediators: a library, a bookseller, a teacher, a critic… or simply a friend.

Like many people of my generation, I spent years discovering culture exclusively through human mediators.

Today, new mediators have joined this long history… and they are no longer human.

Who now guides our cultural discoveries?

Global culture has become a continuous flow in motion.

Works of art, books, films, articles and ideas no longer circulate only through libraries, booksellers, critics and cultural institutions.

They now move through a vast network where search engines, digital platforms and artificial intelligence also help shape their circulation.

In reality, we have already been accompanied for decades by new mediators that quietly organize part of our encounters with culture.

Whether we realize it or not, we already use artificial intelligence when we search the Internet, watch a video on YouTube, receive a recommendation for a film, a song, a book or an article, or simply when social media platforms decide what appears in our news feeds.

The greatest impact of artificial intelligence is not its ability to create images, texts or music. Its greatest impact lies in its role as a mediator, helping shape our cultural discoveries and the circulation of works, ideas and knowledge.

The mediators are changing. Increasingly, they take the form of search engines, digital platforms and artificial intelligence.

Our desire to discover, share and pass on culture, however, remains profoundly human.


📚 View all Micro-Essays

This text is part of the series Understanding Today’s Culture, a chronicle of global networked culture.

→ Back to the Micro-Essays page

Further Reading

🟦 Everyone Already Uses AI

🟦 How Far Can a Publication Go?

🟦 Who Will Shape Cultural and Artistic Recognition Tomorrow?

🟦 The Use of AI in Art: Beyond Creation – Algorithms That Organize Global Culture

🟦 You Already Choose Your Culture

🟦 You Publish… But Are You Really Seen?

🟦 Global Culture as a Moving Mosaic

🟦 Understanding Today’s Culture – View All Micro-Essays


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor

You Already Choose Your Culture

Building Your Culture, One Choice at a Time

Multilingual mosaic of the word culture, a person facing a digital stream of online content and platforms, illustrating the construction of a personal culture within global networked culture.

Read this article in French:
Vous choisissez déjà votre culture

A scene from everyday life.

I log in…

The Web offers me:

  • a Led Zeppelin concert;
  • a retrospective of Van Gogh’s works;
  • a documentary on climate change;
  • a talk on contemporary art;
  • an introduction to Chinese calligraphy;
  • a poetry reading.

I won’t watch everything.

I will choose.

Global networked culture has profoundly transformed the way we discover works, ideas, and knowledge. In just a few clicks, we can explore music, books, knowledge, traditions and creative works from almost every part of the world. Search engines, digital platforms and artificial intelligence have become the main mediators of our cultural discoveries. They suggest, recommend and organize a vast stream of content.

But they do not choose for us.

Culture is no longer only an inheritance. It has also become something we build ourselves.

It was not always this way.

When I was a teenager in the early 1970s, our opportunities for cultural discovery were far more limited than they are today. A few television channels, magazines, cinemas, live music performances, libraries and bookstores were our main gateways to works of art, ideas and knowledge.

Building a personal culture is a continuous process. It does not happen in a single day, but through the works, readings, discoveries and encounters that gradually shape our journey.

Every day, we choose the works we watch, the books we read, the music we listen to, the talks we attend and the subjects we decide to explore. Each choice may seem small. Yet, over time, these choices gradually shape our worldview, our references and our cultural identity.

Recommendations sometimes open doors to works we might never have discovered otherwise. They never replace our freedom to choose the direction of our own cultural journey.

The greatest cultural challenge is no longer gaining access to culture. It is learning to consciously build our own cultural path within an almost unlimited global cultural landscape.

Choosing fragments of global culture to enrich our own culture has become part of the human experience.

Scrolling is moving through the flow. Choosing is building your culture.


📚 View All Micro-Essays

This text is part of the series Understanding Today’s Culture, a cultural chronicle of global networked culture.

→ Back to the Micro-Essays page

Further Reading

🟦 Global Culture as a Moving Mosaic

🟦 Inhabiting the Network — A New Human Condition in Global Culture


© Gilles Vallée | Humanist Digital Artist, Poet, Sculptor